The recently concluded appointment to the USSC filling Merritt Garland’s seat is an affront to anyone who loves our Constitution and a bloody disgrace to whatever few remaining members of Congress still have a conscience.
In some ways the Democrats bear a small portion of the blame as truthfully over several years they did tinker with some of the honored rules and customs of what was once called the World’s Greatest Deliberative Body. But the wholesale slaughter of what remained may bring us to an irreconcilable situation, for many liberal members now thirst for revenge. So many Americans have chosen to chant some distorted talking points and ignored the horror that they have committed.
One current mantra that seems to be popular among the right-wingers is to suggest that there has been no evidence presented that would justify further investigation has been that there has been no evidence provided that suggests the Candidate is not qualified.
Well first off the statement of the victim is evidence.
The therapist’s notes are evidence.
The behavior of the nominee, his demeanor, his angry response to legitimate queries is evidence.
His calendars are evidence.
His evasions to avoid answering simple questions one after another show an effort to deceive the committee and apparently hide something is telling evidence.
The sworn statements of two other victim/witnesses.
The book “Wasted” written by Tom Judge is evidence.
The now about forty (that is 40 !!!) people who have come forward to testify about whatever they saw or personally witnessed is all potential evidence.
And finally, the statements of the politicos who rushed the proceedings through with ungodly fervor and their determination not to call potential witnesses or at least interview them are evidence.
The facts are there in the evidence.
But I do not expect them to bother to honestly evaluate the facts that dwell within the evidence, nor to seek out the evidence that has been concealed by disinterest.
In fact, that very disinterest is a piece of true evidence that partisans simply do not care if they promote a serial rapist, sexual abuser, liar, and binge drinker to the highest lifetime appointment under our Constitution as long as he is their own serial rapist, sexual abuser, liar, and binge drinker.
Good luck sleeping as the truth rolls out.
Copyright 2018, Charles Jensen, All Rights Reserved
I couldn’t see any danger when I voted for Dick Nixon, twice, sure he was a bit dodgy and could use a shave, but he’d never betray the country. A few years later I listened to the Great Communicator and felt that he was a decent enough guy who would never wittingly do real harm, even though I knew he was lying about the Contra Business.
Then along came GHWB, a war veteran, an experienced leader and a family man. At least he could run a short war and get out of the sand dunes.
Bill Clinton arrived, with the baggage from the Arkansas State House. I did not like him or vote for him, but after a while, I could see that he was being harassed unfairly, but Bob Dole, another real veteran, would surely repair the damage.
Well, that did not work out, and listening to GHWB’s son was a turning point. George “W.” did not seem evil, just moderately bumbling, even funny at times, obsessed about WMDs and Cousin Saddam, but I was not yet unduly alarmed.
So I voted for Obama, a quiet, thoughtful man who would definitely put things right again, even if he had been born in Nairobi. But it appears he was blocked at every turn as long honored rules and traditional customs were cast into history’s dustbin.
Hillary dragged along that same Arkansas baggage, but who would have believed that the stalwart defenders of Freedom, the Sacred Constitution, and national fiscal responsibility, the “Grand Old Party” would nominate A Buffoon from Queens, New York, a known serial adulterer, sexual abuser, racist and self-promoting liar, and then swallow all that America, the “City on the Hill”, “Home of the Brave”, Refuge of the poor, the downtrodden, the wretched exiles, the Bearer of the Torch of Liberty, Hope and Mother of Dreams, was known for, to elect a two-bit crooked scam artist who would plunge this great nation closer to the fundamentalist “Gilead-by-the-Sea” that our forefathers tried to avoid.
And now, as Martin Niemöller finally understood, it may be too late, and I am alarmed. Benjamin Franklin, when asked by citizens, what type of government the delegates had created, is supposed to have said, “A Republic, if you can keep it.”
The alarm is sounding for all of us. It is time for true patriots to stand up and be counted.
I believe that Dick Nixon was a victim of a form of paranoia, in that from his upbringing as a member of an extreme minority religious cult, he always felt insecure, possibly not accepted by the balance of society. His parents were dirt poor and he had to work through his HS years. He lost out on entering Harvard due to the high expense, not only of the tuition but the general living and travel expenses.
As events in his life played out, in college, in the military where he served as an Active Reservist, not Regular Navy and in support functions far from combat, in Congress and the Eisenhower administration where his victories were not really respected, his internal weaknesses were reinforced. Losing to Kennedy in a close election that might have been affected by vote tampering in some precincts redoubled his problem, especially since Kennedy represented society’s upper crust, war heroes, and a candidate with a charming personality, a group that never accepted Nixon.
Unlike Trump, he kept things Inside for the most part, but the insecurities were there festering for years.
What I saw in the late sixties was the public Nixon, and I liked him. I voted for him as he claimed to understand the vexatious issues of the Viet Nam unpleasantness that was ripping the fabric of civil discourse asunder.
I was very disappointed by the events surrounding the Watergate affair, and, of course, as facts played out it became obvious that he had been unfit for such a burdensome job. However, I think he trusted in the Constitution and it’s devolved customs and doctrines. In his mind, he may have believed that the slush fund he had from cash donations of well-heeled supporters was justified, and could always be pushed aside if discovered by a new “Checker’s Speech.”
Donald Trump, on the other hand, has a similar insecurity problem complicated by an almost total lack of knowledge of so many issues; Constitutional, Governmental, Geo-political and even social.
Growing up as the poor little rich boy from Queens, New York, he was protected by his father’s wealth and he knew that any successes he claimed came from that wealth, but he simply could not deal or admit that even to himself.
He tends to react openly to slights, real or imagined, further displaying his ignorance. I suspect he has never had a real friend.
I am reminded of the insecurities that haunted Adolph Hitler, feeling that Germany’s very public loss in WW I was due to betrayal by the same upper class that had prevented him from being a successful artist, and like Hitler, Trump held a grudge. Also, Trump is a real danger to the country, it’s Constitution and way of life. His term is a real test of the strength of our democracy. Just as “der Führer” drove a wedge between sections of German society, that led to the deaths of six million Jews, Trump has attempted to create real hatred between a part of American Society and immigrants, legal or undocumented, Moslems, and large segments of our functioning government.
Trump distrusts the concept of Democracy, the rule of law, our semi-socialist society and especially the very idea of a free unrestrained press. If he fails and loses the powers he thinks he deserves, it will be everyone’s fault but his own. If he succeeds life for Americans will be very different within a few years.
President Trump placed massive Tariffs on Chinese imports to the US last Friday.
As previously announced China immediately placed tariffs on US products that were being shipped to China.
Many Americans do not understand that Tariffs are taxes on goods imported into a country. The idea is to force the price of things imported into the USA higher so that goods made here in the US will have a price advantage when the consumer decides to buy the imported version of a product when he or she is at the store making a buying decision.
Initially, the American tariffs are paid by the importer at the “Point of Entry” to customs officials. However, that tax is immediately passed on down the wholesale chain to, the manufacturer who uses the product, or by the retailer who plans on selling the finished goods, such as; perhaps, T-shirts for our children at a local store.
As for the American manufacturer, he pays the increased cost, let’s say, for aluminum to make pots and pans and that manufacturer has to consider his increased cost of raw materials when he calculates his price to the retailer who eventually tries to sell those pots and pans in his or her store.
My experience with costs is that with few exceptions, the manufacturer will pass the increased cost to the retailer and the retailer ( e.g. Walmart ) will adjust the final consumer selling price of most goods that come from other countries and are affected by the import taxes we call tariffs. That means that you and I will pay higher prices for anything that is subject in whole or in part to these American taxes on goods or raw materials imported from China or Canada. Occasionally a retailer may decide to absorb the tax itself, but I wouldn’t count on it.
Traditionally Americans, especially Republicans, have always been for a “Free Trade” economy, which means against all tariffs, either on the goods we import or the products we make here and export to be sold elsewhere. Equally unpopular, as a nation with a long history as a great manufacturer and exporter of finished goods to the world, are tariffs set by other nations on American goods imported into a foreign nation to be used by its citizens.
Once what tariffs are, and what they do, is understood it should not be shocking news that Trump’s import taxes, e.g. Tariffs, will raise the prices of things we routinely buy. As for, tariffs on products we do not use personally such as raw steel or aluminum, remember those products are being imported to be used to make products that are made here and often sold here, everything from large construction machines, to the new coffee maker we might want to purchase.
Photo courtesy CBS News
There is another effect of import taxes, the response of other countries. The president apparently is quite proud of the tariffs placed on Chines goods we import, but immediately China introduced what is called, “retaliatory tariffs” on a wild array of American products sold to and usually imported into China.
This means that the things made in US factories or grown on US farms will be taxed in China making them more expensive to the Chinese consumer in comparison to similar goods made in other countries and not subject to Chinese import tariffs, One of the first and most obvious to be affected is the American corn, wheat, and soybean farmer because, quite simply, to the Chinese importer our products become more costly than those produced by farmers in other nations.
The American auto manufacturers, Ford, GM, and Chrysler are hit in two ways, first the steel they buy to make autos to sell to Americans costs more and so the autos will cost more, plus the autos we make and put on a ship to deliver to a Chinese importer will cost even more when those Chinese tariffs are added, giving a price advantage to autos produced in, for instance, Japan and now India.
If the farmer here loses sales he may be forced to lay off workers he hires and put off replacing some farm equipment he might have needed. That, of course, affects the farm worker in our mid-west, the seed producer and the banker who holds farmers mortgages. Also, the production worker who makes equipment here, e.g. John Deere, or the tire companies whose product is needed to go on farm equipment.
We have seen how quickly manufacturers like Harley Davidson have responded by moving production overseas so that the motorbikes sold there will be made there where neither set of tariffs will apply to their sales.
And who benefits? The Dutch or Belgian worker who gets a job that would have gone to an American worker, the foreign construction company that builds the new factory and the local banker who makes the construction loan. The American worker who got laid off or never hired in the first place may also have to avoid purchasing one of the many foreign vehicles made or assembled right here in the USA.
Meanwhile, if American auto manufacturers, both of American brands and foreign brands made here, lose sales, who is affected, the auto worker and the workers in the associated industries whose orders for goods are lessened or services, all the way down to the Joe Six-pack mechanic working in an auto dealership.
Companies like Boeing need aluminum and other finished goods to go into their multimillion-dollar products so they will have to raise prices. Sales of 737s to expanding nations such as China will go to companies like Airbus, Boeing’s European competitor who are affected neither by Trump’s import Tariffs nor Chinese retaliatory tariffs.
All in all, the bottom line loser will be the American workers and farmers, and those who initially think that they will not be affected since they do not trade directly with China. Mexico or Canada, but when workers are laid off our economy will be damaged. That means we all will suffer.
Lest someone believe that these things are exaggerated, just look at history and see what happened in the past when tariffs were placed on goods entering the country.
I am not usually a fan of TV shows other than News or a Science documentary channel, but one of my favorites is The People’s Court. It is amazing how many people do not understand the essential rules of the Uniform Commercial Code which I think is the same in both Canada and the USA.
Case after case is brought in, disputes over misunderstandings that could be avoided by a little knowledge marinated in a sprinkling of the salt of common sense.
One very frequent problem is that deposits to hold a sale in abeyance are not refundable unless agreed to in advance and memorialized in writing or at least through mutual e-mails, or texts. Deposits purchase time, whether ten minutes or ten days.
Buying a used auto is an “as is sale”. The occasional “Lemon Laws” only apply to new vehicles purchased from a commercial dealer. Not in private sales.
Buying a ten or fifteen-year-old vehicle with close to or in excess of 200,000 miles is not a guarantee of lifetime free repairs. Quite often bad things just happen and are not the fault of the last person you blessed with your patronage.
When renting, where a 30-day notice is required, that means a full thirty days from the next “Rental Due Date” preferably in writing not by voodoo hand signals. And in most jurisdictions, there are laws about informing a vacating tenant the reason security is being withheld in actual writing on paper listing the suspected damages and the estimated cost of repair mailed to the tenant within a specific time period.
Also when a renter vacates the premises, anything left behind whether usable or garbage becomes an expense to the owner that can be charged to the security deposit.
An engagement ring is a gift in anticipation of a wedding. Cancel the nuptials, even for the best of reasons and it needs to be returned to the purchaser. Also, actual gifts given while playing house do not suddenly become loans when the wisdom of a breaking up lights the bulb over your head.
A salesman’s “puffery” (verbal comments) is not a warranty. Trusting a person you only met on Craig’s List or at an auto shop’s back room a few minutes earlier is not a cause of action in court or a reason for slanderous remarks posted on some social media website.
Unless you are a certified auto mechanic with six to ten years of actual experience it is wise to spend a few dollars to hire a real automotive repair technician (ASE certified) to examine a prospective purchase before you sign the sales contract, not a few weeks later when a knocking rod starts to wake the dead as you drive past the nearest cemetery. Your favorite uncle or recent boyfriend may know how to drive but is not the best choice just because he, or she, “knows” about cars.
Your former friend calling you to get his or her money back is not harassment, even if they get upset at your ducking them and avoiding repayment.
Of course, one party to a contract cannot unilaterally decide to change the terms of a contract no matter how convenient it is. A thirty-day warranty on an auto is valid for precisely thirty days, not six months or the first oil change.
The mental idea that, “I never said I wouldn’t pay the loan back, ” cannot be deposited in a bank or mailed to a landlord as payment for rent. It is also seldom useful in buying week to week groceries.
Child support is not a gift to the other spouse. It is your share of the expense of raising, feeding, clothing and housing your child, not something subject to your luck at the racetrack or the change in the price of a bag of weed.
One more thing, when there is any written contract (e-mails or texts may count as well) between parties that clearly lay out the terms of an agreement, prior oral statements, pinkie swearings or sincerely crossed hearts are not admissible. The limits are the four corners of the agreement.
If more people understood these things and a few others before they signed a written agreement, life would be much easier. I am sure other readers can add a few more misunderstood rules.
As Judge Marilyn Milian so often says; a loan of anything over a $1.oo should be in writing, even on a piece of toilet paper, in crayon if necessary, if there is to be any hope of repayment.